R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte A
id:
r-v-criminal-injuries-compensation-board-ex-parte-a-287-14590379
title:
R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte A
text:
R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte A was a 1999 case in the United Kingdom where a decision by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board (CICB) not to award compensation was quashed by the House of Lords as it was deemed to be a breach of the rules of natural justice. The case reaffirmed the principle of "misunderstanding or ignorance of an established and relevant fact" and further developed the doctrine of error of fact, in that a decision could be quashed on the basis of it hav
brand slug:
wiki
category slug:
encyclopedia
description:
1999 English House of Lords case
original url:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Criminal_Injuries_Compensation_Board,_ex_parte_A
date created:
date modified:
2023-08-02T16:18:17Z
main entity:
{"identifier":"Q96317787","url":"https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q96317787"}
image:
{"content_url":"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/eb/Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_%28Tudor_crown%29.svg","width":512,"height":479}
fields total:
13
integrity:
15