Jamieson v HM Advocate
id:
jamieson-v-hm-advocate-199-11545278
title:
Jamieson v HM Advocate
text:
Jamieson v HM Advocate is a notable legal case which established a precedent in Scotland which held that a man does not commit rape where he honestly, albeit unreasonably, believes his victim is consenting. This was a criminal case decided by the High Court of Justiciary sitting as the Court of Criminal Appeal. The appeal case was heard before a panel of three judges with the Lord Justice-General as president, with Lord Allanbridge and Lord Cowie. The case is reported at 1994 SLT 537. The decisi
brand slug:
wiki
category slug:
encyclopedia
description:
original url:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamieson_v_HM_Advocate
date created:
date modified:
2024-03-14T13:56:27Z
main entity:
{"identifier":"Q6147703","url":"https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q6147703"}
image:
{"content_url":"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_%28Scotland%29.svg","width":1550,"height":1500}
fields total:
13
integrity:
14