Hirachand Punumchand v Temple
id:
hirachand-punumchand-v-temple-321-17108508
title:
Hirachand Punumchand v Temple
text:
Hirachand Punamchand v Temple [1911] 2 KB 330 is often cited as one of the exceptions to the accord and satisfaction rule laid out in Foakes v Beer. In that case, it is held that an agreement to accept part payment of a debt cannot validly discharge the entire debt. In Hirachand Punamchand v Temple, part payment of a debt is held to be valid because it is supplied by a third party and not the debtor.
brand slug:
wiki
category slug:
encyclopedia
description:
original url:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hirachand_Punumchand_v_Temple
date created:
date modified:
2023-08-11T13:13:53Z
main entity:
{"identifier":"Q16843436","url":"https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q16843436"}
image:
{"content_url":"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a4/Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_%28HM_Government%2C_1952-2022%29.svg","width":1530,"height":1256}
fields total:
13
integrity:
14