Detroit Free Press v. Ashcroft
id:
detroit-free-press-v-ashcroft-263-1884575
title:
Detroit Free Press v. Ashcroft
text:
Detroit Free Press v. Ashcroft was a case that was heard before the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in August 2002. The plaintiffs, Detroit Free Press, Detroit News, Michigan Representative John Conyers, and Rabih Haddad argued that it was a violation of the First Amendment for the defendants, Attorney General Ashcroft, Chief Immigration Judge Creppy, and Immigration Judge Elizabeth Hacker, to apply a blanket ruling of the Creppy Directive in order to keep immigration hearin
brand slug:
wiki
category slug:
encyclopedia
description:
Court case
original url:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit_Free_Press_v._Ashcroft
date created:
date modified:
2024-01-29T05:09:43Z
main entity:
{"identifier":"Q5265932","url":"https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q5265932"}
image:
{"content_url":"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/24/US-CourtOfAppeals-6thCircuit-Seal.png","width":470,"height":474}
fields total:
13
integrity:
15